Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in its decision regarding federal law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lw the eb card) wary a ae of Phas Case, Luited Itafas Court of Appenls for the focr th Gre cuig Charcot ler Facet! Crew £) he; eM Far ed July (2, Lerp Get of Sephenber 8, beke Jecies CHE ras Somfli cd heli, #£Phe Ses eso wef af Slecike re. ye devia, PUG US IN THY CL009); Buck ws Mavis, HF IST 8 IF T73—2Y (1077); Sewwiary un, Wecdford, Go FX (ee 6, 4010 (4 a PO eita, Stee he at 443 Jbey barbers kf vs Stevacd, are EId £6 705 (9 Cie olen 4] oe The IRR p90 hawt matter, Mwited Yates Cewek ef Aap esl, tor the Nine Cit eit ft hes deel Jed an mn portenf She estion of Feder ad Iau That hes wof $eew, but should be, settled by this loseh op hes decided an important feders) qvestan jy & Way thef Contit; chp a7 ff ref , re a ; eyed decisieops of Hip Courz, Voy Fowre th Circuit clearly abuse its we Hor! fy Wi thaws wertin g Gw ex plese tie of how fourth Gromit Cemehen fs Til FT LOLoO , Saptenher & Lolo ~ Tepfedher LL Row LEAS ont Fe | Peti ti ower Ath sey a, Kebly aot; fy fhe Cferk. of Hej 5 Court, LD of he belies Mo parties below have wo } feresf 3 nw we tee outcome of the PEW Lo, (ty) 27 ~ ~ oo eee“ = EE 7