No. 20-6150
Andres Keyon Roman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment collective-knowledge due-process fourth-amendment narcotics reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure substantive-due-process vehicle-search warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner's constitutional right to substantive due process under the Fourth Amendment in this narcotics case by the denying a motion to suppression on a warrantless vehicle search by permitting the collective knowledge of the officers to create reasonable suspicion
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner’s constitutional right to substantive due process under the Fourth Amendment in this narcotics case by the denying a motion to suppression on a warrantless vehicle search by permitting the collective knowledge of the officers to create reasonable suspicion. hs
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2020)
Attorneys
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent