No. 20-6157
Pedro Hernandez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process motion-to-dismiss prejudicial-error sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court prejudicially err denying petitioner's motion to dismiss based on Sixth Amendment violations?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented For Review Did the district court prejudicially err denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss based on Sixth Amendment violations? ii
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Pedro Hernandez
Karren Kenney — Kenney Legal Defense, Petitioner
Karren Kenney — Kenney Legal Defense, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent