No. 20-616

Stephen Durr v. Department of the Army, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2020-11-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-interpretation motion-to-vacate procedural-rights standing statute-claim statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did The U.S. District Court (Washington, DC), Abuse The U.S. Court Of Appeals (Washington DC) Abuse Discretion In The Denial Of The Petitioner Motion Fee Vacation Of Judgment, Petitioner Amend The Statute Claim Appeal Denied, Also The Petitioner Supplement Judgment On Motion To Vacate Judgment (Appendices A-E) Under FRCP 60(b)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did The U.S. District Court (naslinston, DC), Alse The WS. Coutt Of Appeals (Washing ton ©) Aluse Disccekion Tn \he Denial Os The Reh oner Mabien Fee Vacation OF Vu Agernent, Rebvtioner fendmest Ve Sratae Ciaie\) Appeal Seovest Vode, Also The Rk one Supplement | Chobement On Molton Vo \Jacor t , Sadgponeist CRppendicts A-E) ¢ Under FRCP GO asp )

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-08
Supplemental brief of petitioner Stephen Durr filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-07
Waiver of right of respondents Department of the Army, et al. to respond filed.
2020-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)

Attorneys

Department of the Army, et al.
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Stephen Durr
Stephen Durr — Petitioner
Stephen Durr — Petitioner