Stephen Durr v. Department of the Army, et al.
Did The U.S. District Court (Washington, DC), Abuse The U.S. Court Of Appeals (Washington DC) Abuse Discretion In The Denial Of The Petitioner Motion Fee Vacation Of Judgment, Petitioner Amend The Statute Claim Appeal Denied, Also The Petitioner Supplement Judgment On Motion To Vacate Judgment (Appendices A-E) Under FRCP 60(b)?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did The U.S. District Court (naslinston, DC), Alse The WS. Coutt Of Appeals (Washing ton ©) Aluse Disccekion Tn \he Denial Os The Reh oner Mabien Fee Vacation OF Vu Agernent, Rebvtioner fendmest Ve Sratae Ciaie\) Appeal Seovest Vode, Also The Rk one Supplement | Chobement On Molton Vo \Jacor t , Sadgponeist CRppendicts A-E) ¢ Under FRCP GO asp )