No. 20-6163

Angelique Bankston v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence grand-jury ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement material-omissions professional-misconduct sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government fabricated probable cause and made material omissions in the affidavit, violating the Fourth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘ MoverNmMent wWert-to Seven(7)4imes, would praia Cre ; oid Ng three(3) of their trips to Grand Jurys the evidence and witnessS presented Where (Bankston's) was nor Charged be in violation to Brady C | TU she Government fabricate probable Cause — : and Made material omissions in the entire Affidavit wouldn'+~that vy walate (Bankstons ) Clearly established fourm Amendment Of the Consttction 7 | mt If, (Bankston’s) octtorney failed todo any . pretrial investigation ito any evidence or Qny witnesses who possessed know ledge Concerning Bankston guilt or innocence. puldn'+that fall below prevailin | professional norms and violate (Bankston’s) Sixth amendment to effectve assiSance of counsel? {

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Angelique Bankston
Angelique Bankston — Petitioner
Angelique Bankston — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent