No. 20-6170
Justin David Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-action constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review sentencing sixth-amendment standing statutory-interpretation substantial-assistance
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
did-the-court-err-by-not-holding-a-hearing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4, Did the Destine Covert violate the, defendants Six Hh A mealment right be alles; Specz.| Agent Mele. Batley to testly at the dePrdevks Senfeneing Peering, , there by im posing an unreasonably sentinee It dwleton of (8 Use. $3553? | | 2. Did the destye Court err by net halding a SKI . hearing te ater down werd departure hosel! on fhe a behenSents subs fancial assistance to the government £ .
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent