No. 20-6189
Francisco Javier Nunez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment base-offense-level constructive-possession due-process fifth-amendment firearm firearm-enhancement scienter sentencing-enhancement substantive-due-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner's constitutional right to substantive due process under the Fifth Amendment in this constructive possession firearm case by the adding a four-point enhancement of the firearm base offense level for a scratched serial absent proof of scienter
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner’s constitutional right to substantive due process under the Fifth Amendment in this constructive possession firearm case by the adding a four-point enhancement of the firearm base offense level for a scratched serial absent proof of scienter. 1. secccnemeneenemce
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent