No. 20-6190
Bradley R. Freeman v. New Mexico
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: affirmative-defense brady-v-maryland constitutional-requirement criminal-procedure due-process plea-agreement plea-bargaining prosecutorial-disclosure prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-03-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Constitution require the prosecution to disclose favorable, material evidence of an affirmative defense before entering a plea agreement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented 1. Does the Constitution require, before entering into a binding plea agreement with a criminal defendant, that the prosecution disclose favorable, material evidence of an affirmative defense which the prosecution bears the burden of disproving beyond a reasonable doubt and which can be raised pre-trial as a matter of law?
Docket Entries
2021-03-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-12
Reply of petitioner Bradley R. Freeman filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-03
Brief of respondent State of New Mexico in opposition filed.
2021-01-05
Response Requested. (Due February 4, 2021)
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent New Mexico to respond filed.
2020-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Bradley R. Freeman
Charles David Agoos — Law Offices of the Public Defender, Petitioner
New Mexico
Jane Alissa Bernstein — New Mexico Attorney General, Respondent
State of New Mexico