No. 20-6193
Martin L. Harrell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure diligence-standard due-process habeas-corpus material-fact mcquiggin mcquiggin-standard new-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct summary-denial
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Evidence Not Presented as the Result of Prosecutorial Misconduct Should Be Considered New Evidence under McQuiggin?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether Evidence Not Presented as the Result of Prosecutorial ; Misconduct Should Be Considered New Evidence under McQuiggin? Il. Whether a District Court May Summarily Deny for Lack of Diligence a Motion to Reopen Based on New Evidence, Where There Are Disputes of Material Fact as to Diligence? i
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Martin L. Harrell
Martin L. Harrell — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent