Whether Petitioner's conviction must be vacated due to Rehaif violation

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. Whether Petitioner’s conviction must be vacated because (1) the indictment failed to allege an essential element of the offense—that Petitioner knew he belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm, (2) the government failed to present evidence at trial that Petitioner knew he belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm, and (3) the jury was instructed that it need not find Petitioner knew he belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm, all in violation of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). B. Whether Petitioner’s convictions for aggravated robbery under Ohio Rev. Code Section 2911.01(A)(1) and assault under Ohio Rev. Code Section 2903.13(A) are categorically not crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. 1