No. 20-6202

Jimmy Don Wooten v. Arkansas

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2020-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3005 capital-murder criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process error-coram-nobis statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did 18 U.S.C.A. 3005 apply to Petitioner in 1994 when he was charged with Capital Murder and the Death Penalty was sought?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Did United States Code Annotated 18 U.S.C.A. 3005 apply to Petitioner in 1994 when he was charged with Capital Murder and the Death Penalty was sought? IL. Did the Trial Court violate Due Process by Denying the Petitioner his rights under 18 U.S.C.A. 3005 when the Death Penalty was sought. Ill. Does the Arkansas Supreme Court violate Due Process by limiting what can be brought up on Error Coram Nobis to such a small category when they have no other way for an inmate to bring up a mistake or, error found in his or her case at a later date? IV. Did and Still Does 18 U.S.C.A. § 3599 and Criminal Justice Act of 1964, and amended, (C.J.A. Guidelines) 18 U.S.C.A. § 3006A not apply to this Petitioner? I

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
2020-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Arkansas
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Michael Anthony CantrellOffice of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent
Jimmy Don Wooten
Jimmy Don Wooten — Petitioner
Jimmy Don Wooten — Petitioner