No. 20-6203

Rachel O. v. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services

Lower Court: Alaska
Docketed: 2020-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law alaska-supreme-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection guardianship native-american standing
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where iS To.? (Yo w many interpretations are thee face the word MUNCES ponsive” ? Ts it effechue \istening ot reading tO be closed minded To not gather information and deliberate What a Testimony Uniderls ? Sing there Gre Co many A feerant Latenpretatons Por We word “uncesponsive’, When proficient — gcid locked Vaw prache2ers, and Brithish Pccred ded Rogist Vy members ACTZ on Cecord, ist There, an oath 40 carry out gushce by getting the werd “unfegponsive” ¢ Jani fied s Especially When fre person of in terest F.0., chooseg not to talk 5 and Furthermore, the, Word “unresponsive” Came Lan fo.S witness To attempt +o build Up Po.’ belief in prayer to We Courf— is all Hag more, (@ason to f@ach USHER by getting throat clarified So . | Especially when TO.,M0,, and ¢.0.% WiTNneSS | yo / y wee Gly ia the hearing on December 20, L019 Not reading to be rogessatafed. | Why is Medicaid The Consttwion Mot now Becouse noreneryone believes tA medr Poacher, Ao You Seu Now Medicaid ot rning United States of Anurice’s People? — Freda Es i q cight net ts protected absolutely —S ho :9n7 | WARSPOoNCs ) Pre sented Continued % Will You Send Alaska Superior Court probate, Couick —Oe--aited_States of Ameica-Sudiefal -System Flow Charth Please 7 Ts Alaska Superior Court allowed to Order on any Matter Anat is in actvee AN peal, before, the Alaska Supreme Court Orders On the appealed Matter? Because on 8/8/68 is when the final Order Came from the last hearing on 1/2/1%, IS trere AN administotve rule’ that mandates . how, lon Coucts nave to decide on OrdelS Ho ore iS the Hoeft Guardianship Plan Oraered by Enc Rarseth. whan Co. had it in An open Appeal, in the Alaska Supreme Court Stace B/I7/i® And ne Aloska Supreme Court Aidit Gedar on it unhl 7/24/20 2 Why is there a Bureau of Endian Affairs in ne United States oF Amenca when We are all under tho Unrted Stotes of Dmartog Constitution» protecting our right not +o be Qiscfimi nated by Cacelorigin 7 Un y do A\aska Natwes/Amancan Tndians hove tHyic own classification on every thing, every where sapplicatons for em Loy ment, applicathons for education, a ppllcatia ne ron Funding, Taxes, Ope ications Lor housing, Applicatia ver “medical Treatment” orc, 2 O iS wore just~Una Ss. Gandbhic or ELC Aarcelf Why oes it matter <p rcch to Enc Aearseth that he. is a, word Of The State of Masha 2k have wT Dwer mar him, > Know: TO, hag never met him Buk Enc Rracsedth Vacated Lea Gand brirle Onder

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Rachel O.
Rachel O. — Petitioner
Rachel O. — Petitioner