No. 20-6213
J. Santos Mondragon-Benitez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-authority imprisonment-revocation plain-error reasonableness reasonableness-standard revocation sentencing-review standard-of-review supervised-release
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether sentences of imprisonment following the revocation of supervised release should be reviewed for reasonableness or plain unreasonableness?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether sentences of imprisonment following the revocation of supervised release should be reviewed for reasonableness or plain unreasonableness? ii
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)
Attorneys
J. Santos Mondragon-Benitez
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent