Whether a defense attorney has an obligation to show the defendant live video calls in a capital case and hire a private investigator that the trial court did not require

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , c() 4s i+ Ubfeasmalle Cor a Deferse auttemey -to No} Stow fie deferdont Ive pate Copats wd not allow the ceferbo— 7 fo Wear 4} phere calls in a Copal Goose od rot ire @ pivade inuestyator than he kld fe defwhA be dh? Ts the Defence attorney effar fire Fernot infernig his delordad/ctrt oF Deorse of Clos wh above marten yeases “2 OR woulk a reasanalde Pt obabilly foot bit fa Covnsels UnproFess'na( ecors phat tre teSult oF Prceediig be difFeved oubeome™ OTs r4 Unt eesanche to bwe defordcy\on Castel / nih allow frail 7 od use sfctimwis ae defordet (oq vested om attany 7, a Does We mece Fart that en individual to held Ler iin testgpe tien by law ehfort amend OG icerS ond may have ErSwermr Some qyestions OF Veluntered Some Statements in f CSiponet to yw eshons Gh Ais Own deprive him gf the raat to retrcin from On Suxcing ov Further Qutstions ont | he hag ConSauthd With on octrorney ok here offer Consents to be questioned. “ @ Ts unnessery Proseyrophs jHo4 Clearly THElame the Jy thot have no feagen 10 be Shown , Such 4 Avipy pleleg rhs, when the question is nok whoft Calsek to0 injury bet | Wy dee yey boot place fot mdr Legoofe thn tHe jry Clemty was Shawn Frophic Pres 7 (See atelier ) Go ror QUEENTAS = : t