No. 20-6237
Tags: criminal-history district-court mitigating-factors mitigation-arguments procedural-reasonableness sentencing substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 168-month sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Where the district court failed to consider or address Petitioner’s mitigating arguments and focused exclusively on his criminal history, whether the 168-month sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable.
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)
Attorneys
Jamar Parker
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent