Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED MW Was mr. Ricardos oeernves OF HIS CoNnsTTOTIONAl MENTS Yo Seie RepresenTaTioN wy The Trial CourlS Summary OEMmar OF MIG Timely TeQuestT TO Go Pro se, DI Was Mr. Richards denied MIS Ove Process RiGHtS ley THe Cestructian OF Evidence in bad Faita., THis Coury MosT reverse pio / Conviction, 33 OO Tue Triet Court Fei To impose A Senvence THAT AS ProPporTianave To Mr. Bicharosd CATCUMSTANCES ANDO he CivreUMSTIANCES OF MiG OFFENSE, Thererore EnTiTAg Him Yo Tesentenanc, 4.1 Mees A Sentence Neer Tre Too OF we Searencing Gvideines Ttraage Consntwrte crves BAD OnvSvoal POMSHMEeENT For AN OFFENOeEr WITH SernovuS Menra, Heart Proviems. S.) Does The Top ONd OF The Sentence For Spiming On & GvarO Consenivyote Cruel Ano UNMLVSLAL PUMSH™MENT bhecauSe itn APPENAdTS Condition OF Aspergers Syndrom Ang E160, NO years 15 A *OeaTu Sentence 4 “