Do the lower federal courts have the authority to depart from the pleading standards required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's relevant decisions, when a complaint alleges unlawful and unconstitutional conduct, which, if proven true, would entail an entitlement to relief?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Do the lower federal courts have the authority to : depart from the pleading standards required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's ; relevant decisions, when a complaint alleges unlawful ; and unconstitutional conduct, which, if proven true, would entail an entitlement to relief? Does a District Court have the discretion to deny any opportunity to amend a complaint at the same time it dismisses a complaint with prejudice, when ; there is any possibility that deficiencies may be cured through more specified pleading or without notice, a definitive ruling on the pleadings, or identification of deficiencies within the complaint prior? Can a lower federal court determine it lacks , subject matter jurisdiction over a plaintiff's claims ; and proceed to make a determination on the merits of a plaintiffs claims or “hypothetically” impose or ‘bypass the question of subject matter jurisdiction to make a determination on the merits of a plaintiff's claims, and then subsequently dismiss those claims with prejudice? Can a Circuit Court affirm, in whole, the holding of a District Court, which determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a plaintiff's claims, when the Circuit Court’s determination that the District Court had subject matter jurisdiction over a plaintiffs claims, directly conflicts with that District Court’s holding?