Whether the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED OWwhether ok Not the prosecutlen must always prove Teeritoaial jurisdiction aver 0. erie in ender +o sustain a Conviction? Whether the buadew is ow She pRasesnttOn Yo paave Yoo have juaisdietion 1 US. CoS T Territorial Jurisdiction & Yaa United Chokes, Whethee Ya Agkele UL eaurt ig duitrorized by oxted tts \udictel power under Pro US. Canctitali on be ol\ powers Yaak has boew delegated loy | aNUMeRaTON: : GB) wheter “United Ghates Disteiet Court \e the game Diebetar Goue’h of eo United Skates “ordain” and, estalblished Lay Congress in tHe 18 TOSORESENY Tr 1943, Ho United Stakes Oresarey Cauet wins establ shed In eyery Grate oud Ya tenstoey oF Rueste Ried, So is WH coud aw Aetiee TIT cruel “ordaiw” anid destained oy Congeess 0& 1S Va “Uutra Stakes Viste Couat™ a tani tartal , (egielativg guet 18 US.C: NY 4 becouse it Ts ty the yera\tory oF Peachy Ries § C)Wheltsa the Federoh Goveenment must also ateapt all cosslons ot juaiedehion’ \afhottun o& nick Fedora cxurcts have tu Comey low juris dichivn inv okimiaal cases, a TS y |