No. 20-6252
David Boyle v. Tim Shoop, Warden
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-rules civil-rights constitutional-remedy due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus Jimenez-v-Quarterman judicial-interpretation statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How can Ohioans reset the statute of limitations pursuant to 28-USC-2244(d)(1)(A) when Ohio-Rules-of-Appellate-Procedure prohibit the only remedy raised by this-court-in-Jimenez-v-Quarterman-555-US-113?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED How can Ohioans reset the statute of limitations pursuant to 28 USC 2244 (d)(1)(A) when Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit the only remedy raised by this court in Jimenez v Quarterman 555 US 113?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)