No. 20-6253
Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee
Tags: 18-usc-4142 civil-rights criminal-procedure custody due-process federal-detention judicial-order mental-competency statutory-custody
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether continued custody under 18 U.S.C. § 4142 for almost four months beyond the expiration of an order to determine mental competency violates the Petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L Whether this Court should grant certiorari to determine whether | continued custody under 18 U.S.C. § 4142 for almost four months : beyond the expiration of an order to determine mental competency violates the Petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent Sealed Appellee to respond filed.
2020-11-09
Motion (20M36) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
2020-10-21
MOTION (20M36) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-08-07
Motion (20M36) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2020-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Sealed Appellant
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Sealed Appellee
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent