Whether the state presented sufficient evidence to convict Mr. Davis of attempted capital murder

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Mr Davis Was Convicted uith a penaleade (F.0dGyt7)@) FAdempted Capital Murder. Nr Davis was convicted ontestimony eNidence only PF Shooting tuso people and Mr. Davis was Not convicted aF hactna at them. Me Davis contends he Aid nor Shock Mw. Roney and he Medical veeaeds url\ prove Me Roney wnyery was not From being Shot with a Qual Fifth cireuit reed upon the states Covris Statement of Wefacts an direct Appeal hut signFicantl misstated even that Slanted Version OF the fact. The case tus presents the FM awina quest 1ans, A. Oia the atatve change ist Ook QA O13 For Tex penaleate \6.o\ \doa(h) 14.03 AMP because Second Cour of Appen\s said Wa Mr Davis insnfFieient evidence claim that the Stcte Liag not vequied “XD prove. nck Mr. DAVIS had to Shob* Mr. Roney. Pour in Apri \ay BOvL Mr. Davis Statue \ndlick ment and . Auey~ charge arte he Same Sheotvig, pepe 1s the Wasice element ak the crime OF ushich Wir Dans C6 convicted OF: \G. OS AM. rea Aid ninange. in @ear Ayaovs LI4S tetroaviive to Mr. Davis cose. ? a Triad the even aireury exe in AeFere ing ko We State cour Finding thet Mr. Davis L365 not Peycen ‘ay his Avia cnonset Fadure tO request the Medico! repos OF OScar-Roney/ Yaasiec\ly pounce s Cadure 10 investraote ahe Key evidence oF Oscar-Poney ~ CounShot Lsound oy Ch oid Fifi civcuik eee 19 Aeterna Ye State coor. Finding dharx Myr. Davis UGS Sot Prcjodtee by Wis avich counsel's Falure TO explain Ye venmi fications OF Aalding, a yy eaAe 4 ‘ \ i