No. 20-6259
Angela de Jesus-Concepcion v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel misrepresentation sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel was impermissibly violated
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel impermissibly violated, when the district court erred in failing to grant petitioner an evidentiary hearing where she could establish her claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. 2. Whether Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel impermissibly violated, where trial counsel and the court misrepresented to the Petitioner that she would be entitled to credit towards her sentence for the time spent on house arrest. i
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Angela de Jesus-Concepcion
Adam Wayne Toraya — Adam W. Toraya, Esq., Petitioner
Adam Wayne Toraya — Adam W. Toraya, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent