Whether the District Court and United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered the full context of the other evidence of discrimination by the prosecutor during voir dire

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court and United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit considered the full context of the other evidence of discrimination by the prosecutor during voir dire to determine whether the factually incorrect statements by the prosecutor for excusing prospective Juror No. 7, an African American female, were proof of the Government’s discriminatory intent in striking this juror and a violation of the Petitioner’s right to Equal Protection under the Fifth Amendment as required by this Court’s decisions in Flowers v. Mississippi, 508 US. ---, 139 S.Ct. 2228 (2019), Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. ---, 136 S.Ct. 1737, 195 L.Ed.2d 1, 12-13, 17 (2016) and Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005)? 1 PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING The Petitioner is Sherman Johnson, Jr. The Respondent is the United States of America. No