No. 20-6261
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons first-step-act guidelines sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a DGQM0VS OP Astin give rise to an extraordinary and compelling reasons pursuant to [1423] of the Sentencing Guidelines?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does A DGQM0VS OP Astin Give! o KRise TO AN ExTizaperinany OMD Compelling Reasons PVRS CANT TO [1423}oF the Semtesciny Guipdines ? @) DD Fe Veso6e€ oF She FiRs7 S72 OT Bin Ae DrsverctT Count OM Discrerray Used Fo Determine Grtmeckrpinary GHP Compelling, REASMWS ASSET G UPPATeD PERM
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine — Petitioner
Damien Edward Desjardins-Racine — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent