No. 20-6265
Alfredo Aguilar Jr. v. United States
Tags: 4th-amendment border-search cell-phone cell-phone-privacy forensic-examination fourth-amendment privacy riley-precedent riley-v-california warrant warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a warrantless forensic search of a cell phone at a border port of entry is an unreasonable search
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a warrantless forensic search of a cell phone at a border port of entry is an unreasonable search. 2. Whether, in the light of the privacy interests identified in Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 378 (2014) and Riley's statement that a warrant is generally required before a cell phone is searched it was unreasonable to believe that an warrantless forensic search of a cell phone was permitted.
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2020)
Attorneys
Alfredo Aguilar Jr.
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent