No. 20-6267
IFP
Tags: bad-faith civil-rights constitutional-rights constitutional-violations criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process federal-intervention post-conviction-relief state-criminal-proceedings state-officials
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal intervention in a state criminal proceeding is appropriate given the petitioner's showing of 'bad faith and harassment by state officials' and state law to be applied in the criminal proceeding that is 'plainly and patently violative of express constitutional prohibitions'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ls Feteral intorvertion (vin AB ULC. 8234) in This sfafe, CPinvina) proceeding aypraprinfe given The. petitioner's showing of bet, “bad fart and Warss Med by stale officials” and STafe lat) to be. apelied im the crintaal proceeding thaf 1S “Paply and patedtly Violate of eHFESS const Typ onal prohibsf ions"!
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-06-08
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.