Whether the presumption of reasonableness for within-guidelines sentences approved in Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007) has proved incompatible with the overarching goal of federal sentencing

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the presumption of reasonableness for withinguidelines sentences approved in Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007) has proved incompatible with the overarching goal of federal sentencing that a sentence be sufficient but not greater than necessary in light of the factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).