Would jurist of reason disagree and find debatable the correctness of the Sixth and District Courts' finding of effective assistance of counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : 1. WOULD JURIST OF REASON DISAGREE AND FIND DEBATABLE THE CORRECTNESS OF ’ _ THE SIXTH AND DISTRICT COURTS’ FINDING OF EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO REQUEST AN APPROPRIATE BURDEN OF PROOF INSTRUCTION IN THE CASE-ESPECIALLY WHERE SUCH COURTS RELIED UPON A SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE ANALYSIS RELATIVE THE PREJUDICE PRONG? 2. WOULD JURIST OF REASON DISAGREE AND FIND DEBATABLE THE CORRECTNESS OF ; THE SIXTH AND DISTRICT COURTS’ PROCEDURAL DEFAULT RULING RELATIVE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL-WHERE COUNSEL FAILED TO SUBMIT A PROMISED DEFENSE WITNESS, MISS LAURA SMITH, IN SUPPORT OF THE SELF DEFENSE THEORY PRESENTED BY COUNSEL-AS BEING NON-SUBSTANTIAL TO ESTABLISH CAUSE BASED UPON INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF POST-CONVICTION COUNSEL FOR FAILURE TO RAISE SUCH INEFFECTIVE ; ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL CLAIM? ;