No. 20-6278
Bodhisattva Skandha v. Gloriann Moroney
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion application-of-law attorney-general civil-procedure claim court-discretion facts false-statements fraud jurisdiction legal-procedure official-document parole-board representation standing supreme-court tort tort-claim Whether making false statements in an official doc Whether the defendant is allowed to represent the Whether the respondent was required to apply the l
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court abused its discretion by not allowing the tort claim to go forward?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Issue #1: WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS : DISCRETION BY NOT ALLOWING THE TORT . CLAIM TO GO FORWARD? pp. 7-16 Issue #2: WHETHER MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS ; IN AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES : FRAUD? pp. 16-20 Issue #3: WHETHER THE DEFENDANT IS ALLOWED TO REPRESENT THE PAROLE BOARD WHERE SHE : IS NOT AN ASSISTANT {ATTORNEY GENERAL? . pp. 20-27 Issue #4: WHETHER THE RESPONDENT WAS REQUIRED . TO APPLY THE LAW TO THE FACTS, AS DELINEATED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT? pp. 27-28
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Bodhisattva Skandha
Bodhisattva Skandha — Petitioner