No. 20-6279
Bodhisattva Skandha v. Superior Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex County, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-discretion due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel full-faith-and-credit full-faith-credit ineffective-assistance judicial-procedure mental-condition standing standing-doctrine
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court abused its discretion by dismissing the complaint?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Issue #1: WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT? pp. 6-7 Issue #2: i WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF HAS STANDING ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT? pp. 7-10 Issue #3: WHETHER THE LOWER COURT FAILED TO APPLY FULL FAITH AND CREDIT? pp. 10-12 Issue #4: WHETHER THE RPOI WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? pp. 12-14 Issue_#5: WHETHR THE DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN ADJUDICATION TO DETERMINE HIS MENTAL CONDITION AFTER JUDGE KANE'S . COMMITMENT ORDER ON FEBRUARY 25, 1992? pp. 14-17
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Bodhisattva Skandha
Bodhisattva Skandha — Petitioner