No. 20-6293
Raymond Alan Griffin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-law findings-of-fact motion-to-suppress threshold-determination
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Privacy
CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a district court make findings of fact resolving contested issues in determining that the threshold for holding an evidentiary hearing on a defendant's motion to suppress has not been met?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED MAY A DISTRICT COURT MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT RESOLVING CONTESTED ISSUES IN DETERMINING THAT THE THRESHOLD FOR HOLDING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON A DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS HAS NOT BEEN MET? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent USA to respond filed.
2020-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Raymond Griffin
Michael W. Patrick — Law Office of Michael W. Patrick, Petitioner
Michael W. Patrick — Law Office of Michael W. Patrick, Petitioner
USA
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent