Whether this Court's ruling in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny entitle a defendant to the knowledge, before trial, that a state forensic agent contaminated the defendant's blood sample, where the contents of that sample were a crucial component of the state's case against that defendant

Question Presented for Review Whether this Court’s ruling in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny entitle a defendant to the knowledge, before trial, that a state forensic agent contaminated the defendant’s blood sample, where the contents of that sample were a crucial component of the state’s case against that defendant. i