Whether the petitioner was deprived of due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment due to a prosecution based on perjured testimony, collusion between prosecutors and judges, and lack of a fair and impartial adjudication

QUESTION PRESENTED . Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, in part, “.. nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” Petitioner was prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned to cover up the crimes of Jason John Kegel who is a family member, a relative, or a friend of Robert Lynch, then an assistant district attorney. Petitioner was prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned based solely on the perjured testimony, admitted being perjured, by the complainant himself. Petitioner’s was deprived of liberty and property without due process of law. Petitioner was also denied the equal protection of the law. Petitioner’s trial and conviction lacked fundamental fairness. The Kafkaesque “judicial processes” that Petition had to go through for over 12 years lacked any judicial character. Petitioner did not receive a fair and impartial preliminary hearing, trial, appeal, Post-Conviction proceeding because the collusion between the district attorneys and state judges. Petitioner did not receive a fair and impartial adjudication of his Habeas Corpus petition also because of the collusion between the federal judges, state judges and prosecutors. Petitioner cannot apply for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, because judges at the District Court and judges at the Third Circuit are not impartial judges. As a reason, Petition has to apply for a Writ of Habeas Corpus with the Court as the Court of last resort. i