No. 20-6307
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: atkins-v-virginia death-penalty hall-v-florida intellectual-disability montgomery-v-louisiana retroactive-application retroactivity substantive-rule supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hall v. Florida applies retroactively on collateral review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court’s decision in Hall v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 1986 (2014), merely clarified Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), or announced a new substantive rule, such that it must be applied retroactively by state courts under Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 8. Ct. 718 (2016). i
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-03-17
Rescheduled.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-03-08
Reply of petitioner Gary Lawrence filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-26
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
2021-02-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 26, 2021.
2021-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 12, 2021 to February 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 12, 2021.
2020-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2020 to February 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Gary Lawrence
State of Florida
Amitabh Agarwal — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Amitabh Agarwal — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent