Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated due to trial counsel's conduct involving dishonesty that tainted the entire trial process

No question identified. : | NEQUE S Fon Gaal Anquwven . _ | Petitioner Request to present oka) ARquaent on the Mo figNS lnending before this Honorable Court due to lo pai ry shall be Ide Rived of the gppoahuity fo present its degition on the merits I; A Motion to A é Thin nes ; te All oanties , | This Appedl concerns the issues of being convicted oF eximinal : Hichages, but was in the Vinciaid Department of Connections, Z f elfective Aasistance of Coutae| dus to trial counsel EncAc iy conduct iwwolvinc dis onesty tt tated the whole tra’ photess __Theunsel Failed to wteryew and call wihtess Ms Toyee Teds who hay nave discredited Alleged victim's bestimony, Petitioner's I Th Amendent was wiolabed, due to double jeopardy fourth | | lA endoent violated due to [Ack of probable cause: to initiate — lenin) Dhocced ing wwAeasotable 96; zurcs ANd Annes The Al leged I ietim testimony change but p ettion eR claim Not Guilty ot chikges, lon ARguaent Would Assist the Court in determining Yhe ments | — a _> able oF Contents page@) — Ton ORAL Anqumwent ,