HabeasCorpus
Whether the Indiana Courts erred in denying Appellant effective assistance of trial counsel during closing arguments and sentencing, violating the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Indiana Courts erred denying Appellant was deprived effective assistance of trial counsel during closing arguments and ; sentencing violating the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? 2. Whether the Indiana Courts erred denying Appellant was deprived of effective assistance of Appellate Counsel in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution when Appellate Counsel failed to raise issues that are significant and obvious from the face of the record that are clearly stronger than the issues raised. ii