No. 20-6324
Michael Christopher Laird v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review mental-competency mental-deficiencies post-conviction post-conviction-proceedings procedural-fairness real-and-substantial-doubt
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner denied his constitutional right to due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WAS PETITIONER DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO ADDRESS, DURING POST-CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS, PETITIONER’S COMPETENCY CLAIM BASED ON HIS VERIFIED SEVERE MENTAL DEFICIENCIES WHICH RAISE SUFFICIENT FACTS TO CREATE A REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT AS TO HIS COMPETENCY? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Laird
Daniel Donovan — Daniel Donovan PC, Petitioner
Daniel Donovan — Daniel Donovan PC, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent