Whether the Kentucky Court of Appeals correctly interpreted the Sixth Amendment in holding the petitioner cannot demonstrate prejudice under Strickland when counsel's ineffectiveness resulted in the petitioner's sentences being run consecutively when they would have otherwise been concurrent

QUESTIONS PRESENTED — . — De a : Did the Kentucky Court of Appeals correctly interpret the Sixth. Amendment oo in holding Petitioner “cannot demonstrate prejudice under Strickland’, when ; ; counsel’s ineffectiveness resulted in Petitioner’s sentences being ran consecutively’ _ when they would have otherwise been concurrent? Mo oa, : SOF PARTIES | ae All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. : . "RELATED CASES re . . Salyers v. Commonwealth, No. 11-0R-249 and 12-CR-111, Hopkins Cireuit : Court, Judgement Entered March 18, 2014 . , oe oo _ _ Salyers v. Commonwealth, No. 2014-$0-186-MR, Kentucky Supreme. Court, ) ' Opinion Rendered May 14, 2015. oo a, . Salyers v. Commonwealth, No. 2017-CA-987-MR, Kentucky Court of Appeals, , 7 we “Opinion Rendered Januaxy 10, 2020. <, ; a ; : a 7 ; oo en Salyers ve Commonwealth, No. 2020-SC-48-D, Kentucky Supreme Court, Decided July 1, 2020. i ae ; 7 : a | oe | 7 . . oo " 'TABLEOF CONTENTS | | a Questions i , List of . . . Related . .