No. 20-6339
George B. Larsen v. United States
IFP
Tags: bad-faith-defense bank-fraud due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment jury-instructions sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's bank-fraud jury instructions that erroneously omitted a factually supported bad-faith defense violated the defendants' Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to due process and a fair trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Where a United States district court’s bank-fraud jury instructions erroneously omit a factually supported bad-faith defense — which is an absolute defense — do the instructions violate defendants’ Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to due process and a fair trial? 1
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2021-01-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2021.
2021-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 19, 2021 to February 18, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2021.
2020-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 17, 2020 to January 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)
Attorneys
George Larsen
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent