No. 20-6351

Johnny Tippins v. Patricia Caruso, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-law legal-compliance standing state-actors statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recall its mandate to prevent a miscarriage of justice because the district court did not apply a law that allegedly violates 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : (hestion Presotd | | Should th Us hh linet of Ayals fi th bi Cricatt recall Hs andok 4b prewnt a miscamage F shew because +h bie Sat ad % aph a law hig Slehde ich, wi Laws $ (00.55 4 Pihaers $ 143 Civil rights complain. Whee the lagu om tedecal shbute insets Ihal urs bh tthe h he slahdes (stek law) and are dblgated ib apy shite hag Sates in § 199° achons? i

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-07
Waiver of right of respondents Blaine Lafler, Barbara Meagher, and Patricia Caruso to respond filed.
2020-12-07
Reply of petitioner Johnny Tippins filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-25
Brief of respondent George Kubin and James C. Kelly in opposition filed.
2020-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Blaine Lafler, Barbara Meagher, and Patricia Caruso
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
George Kubin and James C. Kelly
Mary MassaronPlunkett & Cooney, P.C., Respondent
Mary MassaronPlunkett & Cooney, P.C., Respondent
Johnny Tippins
Johnny Tippins — Petitioner
Johnny Tippins — Petitioner