No. 20-6352

G. N. W. v. New Jersey

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2020-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel speedy-trial
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether reasons for delay are relevant to both sides

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Vin ; gol . val cane. a oe: my ‘ | : 2pe “ever ave feos YSO rerep Suipr ODS BLS: Y “sx2300 vod | ge SQuy 20 pesugeQD ~ayO 40 Sy pow p ne WORE) es : : CH Lee oeeg/ B17 fo Calporegisend BWeyp Sevag ~o© Servo pray 7 |, fo Fug oud ap geen Be a9 cane port Sayp VM y Yo fp vargas! : i : Neue prob tes /7se7 £ goiurd) Go7ee Sg QRS erferct arne? Peet boos ot (SABE YO [7erse xa, 5 OS PIE ISVID [jue Op prr0d rap ae Se-pomue sop oapered peerS Op Seesoe Pessimerol 20/29 ee oo “ypwesre) FI Se esprprecsy prarvGns gainer Soesss 62) soesss east asel _ Cye3] Bh (Q) sense! Peansyaun (@) Ok Pere fod Pepamne Cy : Jrvp Sageec|S peo PUBL yo cospopOun ME puormapaeer: SsierssO Ap vapor = PO" ji | op Zope oP seojesaoSns oP pxapued aprsenpe co? C22 os uo go pemgeve aud Srgeayo SF ar wou CE; ar Bop ro UplprFayyD uso soup @ Mio! (1 ress aoup (]27p AQeee’S ap PuBIs yo eepe/otA 70 fos wreaerra) Vag WA (SELCPHXO Bop ROSES ARI OF CAO MARS = op preBo pasado Co 9g SPETIRIIR -t “P4FOUC bo meg RPSw ypsolwa we Pira0¢g wt 3? aMPATD ae pew) Soap aoe le, CHO 1 yrewer be ae) al sa Loe pratue ve vo wugetereA eroDD -9ou eh C2 CIO sw bo sr aeene? Duugp CG Hie Qyarsaj2 a CROPNS 54 boas APO Ge! P, eee? Go Si TOUA ou veuCo PIFSRI psloluvo a to BrP” pr seme Ye ayparol pou 5/ Sen pornos ; i. : SCULVID p77 O pryecdohke MeuKCn SNGVOISE st pl 2eup?ue? aay iy vo SapDd GO prasoDd Cysnaingo st voy oA eoam YOCE aseooeey a 7 Cyareue BANID Ge Gp pre Prod gee “2 SayPeH Cpee CROP eon pep LO eesspet sarpoD BD CEIBITOA veo Yup ae Sy ipo Crap aa ‘Ber prayoiy CyseIroyS sven srova pepevelo PMHPEMCR) Plog i : { <p SWIPnd L peg Se)ye oho De, ISA St : apyest sy 51220, 24 sey Cuo pop sy SIPQ Po Los Cay Jo SL agaqng Coy Sapree?s OLA hoe oO oe’ 72%? 2) ot Cro Eas sree! WpjIes ASOD yO OF Lop 9D07 exyo0 oe ay Groady ¢e sOQ 80D pared Bertancy r / ue iviGa SehoQorw Sv 0js:9eR BSIDAO ay GR Se) Duvel i ge exept Othe Nv tpo, po peed eo7p OF SEpou prreo fof2ero ~— “@eapp 27 po 7D eI ME *eQIWOO SaPEQPAUL (prapu> aan wv pe 58a) S Sergperard Org “Lapwoypar 5 eorpoond sv) BBon-e, Se-poorsuss 20 a Panga vr Kiopmeages gp? 250 (E) Ssroy NWO YBUS? SMVEeVvIO FO i. PS see So rwenipe FEIDID SUNMH()preoD pafadlo UP PBupIuC) NoxNved? 270HC7 40 Tev2N2 | Gerercl Violotioas ant to * S POL geil (74 wAR) i (Whether “reasons fee... Period [ela ve OE 2, ANE MED es 4o both Sides” “Gecause Speedy trial ssves [are relsed at WFbeat tines eo) ossiéle, 2 — [svn rerecged™2g question preantA Ook vuts, Se) Svedlew aT Cxcludae Hreka or Felice ? ede | Mears co (HE ci) deberd ont TA)si2g (SSE OF Constdecatian 2 Vila latter a of Clana to & Speedy teva) 19 Svagested Yo be MNselP rad re a vloistog of right to setedy tral, : —_ 2. Absolute, oc total avnovrt of tine yo Srtrel Js Svegesded do . Be WHEE Wecasectveas oC Gourds delaty fereglcerrd, Are weelevent, igh Oe HBC) pree ceed Ma, BElens by Courk oc Prosectrans Cedeme re fenelerszd or ore Gxctted bx. subsequent delarss . py ® ! CA) Yon! sutfert delays by Cob oc OmseclHen ave Be Chou by CG) a messoe of eredentege or actions of Ro by Tease oc Heel SoPRiedt YO dene a apeedy bern / bv | AS eP al Comprensive Law D)sto oplator that” d@. divides Bes Phe gvecedi delau mdo Olsereade Penods omd then ee Explaing And Cveluades woe reases Br delay (Mis Ireeleveatse oc Sbes vob Cguede Yo circbynsdescer . ee — OD Shen PPasecadion(e}ib) ¢0o Provide Such m ther Phig Pie (2) Falled 40 ProWde roe? rot tre: belans 32 wet conte/ete YE! YS Oreiudices Cede gee @ Prosecutrons Fallure Fo Ba sve SdeS od qnant Hrery on wet daather op Fundy. eMere Suelr Gondribuled “de cowds oka : Y — rare pete rs deve when Q)hengd-h abi Sey we Ses Maplteade of oF least Ove Qc eethiiise Pratumpdti ta te; orl) ene Paetors of leugth anplren 423; (8) Asse of ebent ba ext Gy 20 ~ “beast| onc, (3) aresemprve presodiée oc etual ergodie mal meted Pa oc fo Gree! oT tiaw caunder to oseel CxRjcdices bry ie : | .. Prasecettion is Not rensered “relevert ve fo () mere reacen Br Selan exiSds acon feck oF yeegany heviag Gee

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)

Attorneys

G. N. W.
Gary Wolchesky — Petitioner