No. 20-6361

Robert L. Davis v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining plea-negotiations post-conviction-review standing weight-of-evidence
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the weight of the evidence supports the defendant-petitioner's claim that counsel lied about a material issue, resulting in ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED we EK Pino po ted ns oe United StotesCourt_of AP Peal ancl Micelle Dis tira to Sok Elena has oleseteal So Fixe Reale the accebhed andl use| course _of judicial _weview of 0 hetero Mi. Coober ~ BOG S186 = Missouri MW Frye clatmn this ems ——-peamviage of justice Question et tse slate olisputes, does_-_ —___the_weight ofthe evicleuce ge. toDefendant= Petitioner if. the. _ VE. como tevec| thatcounsel lite dabout_a_matenta. |__issue_e ce —— EXP ination for. Ques hon 3 2m . ee _fetition ex—Fileot_ Counsel Due elevrol hn ob. because —_he “felt olf ac thy OF the Andi eseriisim Fife ctive.Decilth Penalty Act oF 2 4m Wthen Mees esting argumeuts.,.The US. Disteret Coumt..—— oleic nl_ Petitioners Motion fre oPMoinhment of Counsel_(dec.3). So Pethionen mone! foe the Bro Se liberally Constee Protec. +E Hom, but the Distiet Count olented We Se the AE DPA_..0mexPlaineet. how. the ce wiou! ool Seu — tone (Doe HB, Py 29) Arch the Ltn Chrceuit helely ae a2 Dawiissclaim was Factally insufficient CAP Rem cli Xs Ay Pn tt 2 oe Wi Question se Qo Desa Pio Se_hthevelly Conshare lacteine reguest Protect. SQ ences tiated legal ohily ono (AED PA) review 2 ——— — ___ LE yPi ination _Fox_Questiow st QA ee eect ane Seen wus .col__to File nig Brom the U.8,—Discoiet Couwh, amd Sober You _ -—o_not _neea to cite law Ab ienal!X =F). aa Questo 2 Ann Can the U8. Dishsict Count cleny Petitionen Relic because — neditd not cite law because. forms instructions) steteol AE xP linatton For Queshien se 3 oo Pot ht fonew ts claim ond.the Ere —— Gre usacdOn.enS hhow.es that h is_couuse! _entevecl_c oumtveawsoned Lim awed Fee iuny teal, eventhough the Mroseci tan oF Receol hey. —— 24 months Plea clea! Fae Bbthtonen, Counsel then blocixecl Metthonet——. —_Frrom_accePhiag Plea OR fen nancl_ow making o olecession om Plea 1 Question tt 3 1 by Breventise eb __ Hone _ficomolectoling what Plea to enter Does_asubseguant 1 gueshiouable statement that pb {sentence ,tevminate the Shrretialcmar © Ono fee Glam 2 pn ee a — we TST OF PARTIES All peties dla nat_aPtear inthe CaPbion of the CaSe ce _ Pout s Mot bisted a a Ht) Public De fendesi_of The 13m Juclieial Creuit Count Tia 0 olf Hills owourg le _C ausity.. Flowers pn i PO BOM NT QO ng Tete EL BBC ON a RELATED. CAS ES |

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-02-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-21
Waiver of right of respondents Mark S. Inch, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Mark S. Inch, et al.
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Robert L. Davis
Robert L. Davis — Petitioner