Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Delnusace Supceme Court's rule that alu lnoligent defendanct must accept his teal counsel's decision to plea coutty to ficst degcee capital mucher over his express dbjectious or represent himself vitiates the uslunchareasess of petthencer's waiver of counsel and uclate his 6th Amendment secured autonomy rights not to plea guilty and to testy
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7 Whether The Delnusace Supceme Court's Rule That Alu Lnoligent Defendanct Must Accept His Teal ———Counsels Decision Ts Plea Coutty To Ficst Degcee ———Capetel Mucher Ouec His Express Dbjectious Or Represent Himself Vitiates The Uslunchareasess OF ——Petthencer’s Waiver OP Counsel And Uclate His —_bth Amendment Seouced Rutrouomy Bie hts Mot Te : —Plen Guilty Aud To Testy a Ba
2021-04-19
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2021-03-24
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-02-22
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2021-01-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent Delaware to respond filed.
2020-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)