No. 20-6372
Willie E. Ashe, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights counsel-assistance geders-precedent geders-v-united-states plain-error presumptive-prejudice right-to-counsel sequestration sequestration-order sixth-amendment trial-interruption
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals erred in failing to reverse petitioner's convictions pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution as interpreted by Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80 (1976), and its progeny
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question presented Whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals erred in failing to reverse petitioner’s convictions pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution as interpreted by Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80 (1976), and its progeny. List of
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Willie E. Ashe, Jr.
Dana Elise Lobelle Hofferber — DELH, Petitioner