No. 20-6376
Sean Jason Harstine v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-of-defendant appeal breaking-and-entering criminal-history due-process juvenile-offender juvenile-offenses point-calculation sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it was error to count criminal history points for four 2004 breaking-and-entering convictions when the defendant was only 17 years old at the time of the offenses
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. WHETHER IT WAS ERROR TO COUNT CRIMINAL HISTORY POINTS FOR FOUR 2004 BREAKING AND ENTERING (B&E) CONVITIONS WHEN THE DEFENDANT WAS ONLY 17 YEARS OLD AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSES. ii
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Sean Harstine
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent