No. 20-6381

Domenico Anastasio v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-conviction criminal-procedure district-court indictment rico-conspiracy second-circuit standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit erred by affirming the judgment of conviction and sentence pronounced by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on Count One of the Superseding Indictment charging a RICO Conspiracy because it failed to properly apply the standard set by this Court to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to show that a defendant was guilty of RICO Conspiracy

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit erred by affirming the judgment of conviction and sentence pronounced by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on Count One of the Superseding Indictment charging a RICO Conspiracy because it failed to properly apply the standard set by this Court to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to show that a defendant was guilty of RICO Conspiracy. i

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Domenico Anastasio
Peter J TomaoPeter J. Tomao, Esq., Petitioner
Peter J TomaoPeter J. Tomao, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent