No. 20-6393

Todd C. Hughes v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-11-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment post-conviction postconviction-motion sexual-predator
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Florida Second District Court of Appeal and the Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit violate the Petitioner's and like situated inmates, rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, cruel and unusual punishment and due process, respectively, when deciding the Petitioner's postconviction motion claiming that his designation as a sexual predator is illegal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a Did the Florida Second District Court of Appeal and the Florida Sixth Judicial Circuit violate the Petitioner's and like situated inmates, rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, cruel and unusual punishment and due process, respectively, when deciding the Petitioner's postconviction motion claiming that his designation as a sexual predator is illegal. 8

Docket Entries

2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Todd C. Hughes
Todd C. Hughes — Petitioner