No. 20-6402

Eric Treantos v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review booker-standard booker-v-united-states criminal-appeal criminal-sentencing first-circuit-court-of-appeals gall-v-united-states judicial-discretion procedural-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines united-states-v-eric-treantos
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the First Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in petitioner's case conflict with this Court's decisions in Booker v. United States and Gall v. United States which held that criminal sentences must be procedurally reasonable?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does the First Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in petitioner's case conflict with this Court's decisions in Booker v. United States, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) and Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (200?) which held, inter alia, that criminal sentences must be procedurally reasonable? -2 CITATION United States v. Eric Treantos, No. 18-1543 (1st Cir. July 23, 2020) (Judgment), A true copy, attached, at

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-23
Motion (20M39) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2020-11-04
MOTION (20M39) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-22
Motion (20M39) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal.
2020-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Eric Treantos
Raymond Elwood GIllespieLaw Office of Raymond E. Gillespie, Petitioner
Raymond Elwood GIllespieLaw Office of Raymond E. Gillespie, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent