I. In Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, this Court reserved whether a
formal objection at the time of sentencing is required to preserve abuseof-discretion review of the procedural reasonableness of a sentence.
Circuits are now split on the question. What is required of a defendant
to properly preserve a claim of procedural unreasonableness?

II. Whether Mr. Cuddington's sentence is substantively reasonable in light
of his exceptional history and characteristics?

what-is-required-to-preserve-procedural-reasonableness-claim