Whether the Ninth Circuit's rule that prison personnel testimony that they 'work at a United States prison' contravenes the requirements necessary to establish that the prison falls within the 'special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States' as required by 18 U.S.C. § 7(3) and Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (1943)

QUESTION PRESENTED In an 18 U.S.C. § 113 prosecution, does the Ninth Circuit’s rule that prison personnel testimony that they “work at a United States prison” contravene the requirements necessary to establish that the prison falls within the “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States” as required by 18 U.S.C. § 7(3) and Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (1943)? i